Hello from Australia!

  • MUA Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics is the largest general statistics group in Victoria
  • Business Analytics is broad-ranging, including fisheries, data visualisation, extreme weather events, and more theory-based research.

My roadmap

  • Bachelor of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Adelaide (completed 2012)
  • Masters of Philosophy at the University of Adelaide (completed 2015)
  • PhD at the University of Melbourne (completed 2019)
  • Joined Monash University in mid-2019
  • Including honorary position at the SaferCare Victoria, Department of Health & Human Services
  • Recruited into the COVID-19 response in late February/early March
  • Appointed “Modelling & Forecasting Lead” in late March
  • Appointed Manager of Analytics in September
  • Rejoined Monash in 2021, including the Doherty COVID-19 Modelling Consortium
  • Joined EBS in September 2021

Burden of Healthcare Acquired Infections in Australia

Coauthors: Brett Mitchell, Tracey Bucknall, Allen Cheng, Phil Russo, Andrew Stewardson

Healthcare Associated Infections

  • Healthcare associated infections (HAIs) associated with increased morbidity and mortality
  • Five of the most common HAIs are:
    • Clostridiodes difficile – causes severe damage to the colon, can be fatal
    • Bloodstream infection (sepsis) – estimated mortality rate of 15-30%
    • Urinary track infection – low mortality but associated with multi-drug resistance and significantly longer hospital stays
    • Healthcare acquired pneumonia – mortality rate of 40-70%, increasing dramatically with age
    • Surgical site infection – significantly increases length of stay

In Australia, HAIs are not notifiable => We have no robust way to track whether their prevalence is increasing or decreasing

Europe tracks these closely

HAIs are actively monitored across Europe through the ECDC

  • In 2016 (based on 2012 data), 2,609,911 new HAIs are estimated to have occurred.

The data were obtained in a point prevalence survey on an enormous scale

  • 273, 753 patients
  • 1,149 hospitals

Point prevalence survey

A point prevalence survey counts the number of people with a condition on a given day

For the Australian PPS:

  • Adults in 19 large acute care public hospitals were sampled
  • All acute care wards were include, non-acute, paediatric, neonatal ICUs, rehab and emergency departments were excluded.

The hospitals sampled make up approximately 60% of all overnight separations in Australia

Point prevalence survey

  • 2767 patients were sampled between 6 Aug and 29 Nov 2018
  • Median age: 67 (range 18-104)
  • 52.9% male, 46.6% female, 0.5% unknown/other
  • 85.7% patients in major city hospitals

Estimation methodology

Step 1: Hospital prevalence

Hospital prevalence, P, estimated as

P = r \times Beta(n_{\text{obs}}, N-n_{\text{obs}}+1) + (1-r) \times Beta(n_{\text{obs}}+1, N-n_{\text{obs}})

Estimation methodology

Step 2: Estimation of hospital incidence

Hospital incidence, I, calculated as

I = P \frac{\text{LA}}{\text{LOI}}

where

  • P is the hospital prevalence from step 1,
  • \text{LA} is the mean length of stay and
  • \text{LOI} is the length of infection.

\text{LA} is taken from the AIHW 2018 statistics on all public hospitals.

Estimation methodology

Step 2a: Estimation of length of infection

No data on length of infection, only LOI_\text{pps}, the length of stay until the date of survey.

We can calculate

P(LOI_\text{pps} = 1),

the probability a patient is in the first day of their HAI. Then, approximate LOI with

E[LOI] = 1 / P(LOI_\text{pps} = 1).

For small sample sizes, results has shown this is biased, so we use a mixture of this estimator and the empirical mean.

Estimation methodology

Step 3: Estimation of population incidence

Calculate population incidence as

I_{\text{pop}} = I \times N_{\text{discharges}}.

For us, N_{\text{discharges}} = 3,713.513, which is 60% of the total admissions in the year.

This is one of the few pieces of data Australia has that the ECDC doesn’t!

Estimation methodology

Step 4: Stratification by age and sex

Use a multinomial likelihood with a Dirichlet prior, with weights taken from the number of cases in each age/sex category.

A psuedocount is added to each strata (0.001\sum \text{weights}) to ensure likelihood can be calculated with empty strata

This psuedocount almost surely induces bias, and there are better techniques out there.

Estimation methodology

Step 5: Adjustment for life expectancy

Use the McCabe score, which gives the life expectancy according to severity of disease. Patients are categorised as:

  • non-fatal
  • fatal (life expectancy 3 years)
  • rapidly fatal (average life expectancy of 0.5 years)

These scores, combined with disease outcome trees, give DALYs and deaths.

Disease outcome trees

Key results

Number of HAIs
(95% CI)
Deaths
(95% CI)
DALYs
(95% CI)
SSI 44,238
(31,176 - 73,797)
876
(617 - 1,263)
13,197
(9,298 - 19,001)
UTI 42,408
(25,200 - 68,735)
729
(259 - 1,772)
16,087
(5,939 - 37,218)
CDI 5,125
(2,360 - 10,740)
262
(13 - 836)
2,757
(241 - 8,655)
HAP 51,499
(31,343 - 82,877)
1,904
(462 - 4,430)
39,276
(17,608 - 77,915)
BSI 23,979
(15,658 - 36,245)
3,512
(1,874 - 6,075)
46,773
(26,205 - 79,104)
All 170,574
(135,779 - 213,898)
7,583
(4,941 - 11,135)
122,376
(85,136 - 172,784)

That’s 1 in 20 admissions resulting in an avoidable infection!

Key results

Key results

Key results

Novelty

  • First estimate of HAI burden in Australia using (relatively) robust survey data in an established framework

  • Based on first point prevalence survey since 1984

  • There is no routine surveillance of HAIs in Australia

  • Point prevalence surveys remain the only way to understand the burden of these conditions

Summary

  • 498 DALYs per 100,000 is a large amount
    • Motor vehicles: 180 DALYs
    • Infectious diseases: 370 DALYs
    • Respiratory diseases: 1380 DALYs

This work has informed guidance on HAI surveillance in Australia, including new funding schemes to better understand these conditions.

And all this based on just 2767 patients from 19 hospitals…

HAIs are largely preventable.

They represent great opportunity for improvement, and we have a long way to go to prevent them entirely.

Carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales colonisation status does not lead to more frequent admissions: a linked patient study

D. Wu; T. Donker; B. Cooper; M. Easton; N. Geard; C. Gorrie; D. Hennessy; B. Howden; A. Peleg; A. Turner; A. Wilson; A. Stewardson on behalf of the ECHIDNA study group

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

  • Gram-negative bacilli occurring naturally in the GI tract
  • Resistant to carbapenem antibiotics
  • Several different carbapenemases genes in CPE:
    • Imipenemase (IMP)
    • Klebsiella penumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)
    • New-Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)
    • Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) and
    • Oxacillinases (OXA)
  • For Enterobacterales, IMP(-4) most commonly found in Victoria (28% of all cases)
  • Assumed to be colonised indefinitely

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales

  • Surveillance officially established in Victoria in 2015, became notifiable in 2018
  • Since becoming notifiable, notifications have been steadily increasing

Modelling possible control

  • We know that healthcare is a network phenomenon
  • Need to understand if CPE+ patients are different to CPE- patients

Research questions

  1. How frequently are CPE+ patients admitted to a health service other than the one they are diagnosed?
  2. Are patients known to be colonized with CPE admitted more often or to more locations than a random patient?

Health Services in Victoria, Australia

  • Health services are individually governed
  • Centralised guidelines for reporitng
  • Have their own IP results, testing/screening requirements, admission & transfer patterns
  • Are often spread across multiple campuses which operate independently but are administered centrally

As these services tend to operate on the same patient data platform, we assume that previously diagnosed patients will have infection prevention protocols in place if they are re-admitted to the same service.

This is less likely to be true in a different health service, as there is no centralised notification system to other health services.

Notification system

Data sources

Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset (VAED):

  • Line list of every hospital admission (public and private)
  • Reports demographics, conditions, treatments, timing, location

Public Health Event Surveillance System (PHESS):

  • Records information on notifiable disease events
  • Includes patient demographics, date of notification, date of test
  • Operational system, used for contact tracing and outbreak analytics

Control Population

To fairly compare between CPE+ and CPE- patients, construct a series of comparator populations which increasingly closely approximate the CPE+ cohort

  1. Random subset: patients are randomly sampled from the population
  2. Campus and time: Patients are matched to CPE-positive patients based on the hospital campus and the quarter-year (i.e. 3-month period) of admission
  3. Campus, time and age: As per Cohort 2, plus the inclusion of five-year age band
  4. Campus, time and comorbidities: As per Cohort 2, plus the inclusion of age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index category.

Survival Analysis

Use the Kaplan-Meier estimator:

\hat{S}(t) = \prod_{i:t_i \leq t} 1 - \frac{d_i}{n_i}

where

  • d_i is the number of events that have happened up to time t_i, and
  • n_i is the number of individuals known to have survived up to time t_i.

Statistical methodology

To calcualte the time until next admission, we set the time 0 to be the time of discharge from a health service where CPE was diagnosed

Statistical methodology

Time of event is defined to be the time at which a patient was readmitted to a new health service Time of censoring is either death (if known) or the end of the data (30 November 2019), meaning patients have unequal study lengths.

Admission Frequency

Admission Location

Admission Timing

Conclusion

  • Healthcare is a network problem, patients move very frequently
  • This is true independent of CPE colonisation status
  • Those who are CPE+ seem to be re-admitted faster on average
    • Are they sicker people?
    • Do they need more frequent follow up close to home?
  • Design of control schemes need to consider the linked nature of health services

Other ongoing work

  • Machine learning methods to identify risk factors for hospital infections
    Leong Zhuan Kee, Vis; Ewilly Liew
  • Estimating rates of contact in the absence of local data, conmat
    Nick Tierney; Nick Golding
  • Understanding how non-linear dimension reduction warps your data
    Jayani Lakshika; Di Cook
  • Predicting extreme weather events using short- and long-term climate drivers
    Kate Saunders; Jarryd Chapman
  • Approximating patient movement patterns with piecewise constant networks
    David Wu; Andrew Stewardson
  • Developing non-network based network layout algorithms
    Krisanat Anukarnsakulchularp; Di Cook

…and more.

If your work is broadly related to infectious diseases, or biosciences, I would love to talk more.